I'm of the view that there is almost perfect correlation between the I.Q. of the woman and the quality of the "nookie." That would, technically speaking, be a correlation coefficient of 1.
For those with first hand experience, I'm wondering what correlation coefficient you would assign, generally speaking, to FSU women, when relating I.Q. to the quality of the "nookie ?"
I can't believe it! harantis, you already have a pretty bad fame among the girls from the ladies' forum, and reading throught your posts, I understand why. And just for whose "consumption" was "this" intended?
You're right. My name is "Mud" on the women's forum. It seems the women thought I was really out of line commenting that a women who had a picture of herself with a .38 held to her head was (and I quote myself) "a little over the top." Then they had the good sense to rip some other guy to shreds because he agreed with my characterization. Well, to be honest Masha, if you actually look at the picture to which I was referring, I'm speculating you would have to agree that my criticism was actually a bit mild. Frankly, holding a .38 to your head in a photograph designed to attract a member of the opposite sex isn't really a "little" over the top, IT'S A LOT OVER THE TOP.
Who knows ? Maybe you, like they, are simply an apologist for this woman's extremely poor taste. More likely you've never actually looked at the photograph. I'd hate to think you're pandering to the pack mentality on the other half of this website who apparently think by virtue of their gender, they can do no wrong. At best they have exhibited a "stick together" mentality against the men (as if somehow men were the enemy). To your credit however, your excessively broad and unfounded criticism does not. Insightful as to the general level of integrity and our respective views about the equality of the sexes, don't you think ? Does it offer you even a hint as to the esteem in which they hold men in general ?
The beginning of this particular thread was specifically designed "give them something to cry about." Ironic that you lunged for the bait before they had a chance to even nibble. It would have been interesting hear the depth of the crys of absolute agony over this thread as compared to the former, as if my prior comments were somehow percicutorial and not dead on the mark. But alas, my cover is blown.
It is self-evident that there are indeed lengthy discussions on their forum which rather clearly discuss document forgeries for purposes of circumventing or evading the intent of the visa process. They also seem to feel they have carte blanche to discuss gentlemen's sexual prowess by name. Again, at best, those lines of discussion exhibit extremely poor taste.
I'm guessing that with this thread we would have learned that turnabout was not fair play. Instead, let me suggest, that we will now learn the correlation between your I.Q. and your integrity.
harantis,
the ladies' forum deserves harsh criticism. Nonetheless, it seems obvious to me that giving up our decency is not the best way to help the ladies who write in that forum improve its standard of decency.
Okay - I just spent a little time at the other forum and I STILL can't find the thread where ladies were upset about us chatting about a profile picture with a gun. Which thread is it?
I DID find a lady saying "HELP", somebody else is using my picture. She mentioned that some guy writing to here was apparently alarmed to find a profile posted by a scammer using THIS girls pictures. Must be difficult to be so beautiful that others are pinching your photos for scam purposes.
Don't you question my integrity, that's the one thing I know I have and hold on to in my life.
You are absolutely right, I havent seen the gun picture. In fact I didn't have a slightest idea about the picture discussion that took place on the women's forum, and your name being Mud there, until you told me. If I had seen the picture, I might have laughed at it myself. The one who overreacted to your criticism, must have been the very girl from the shot, and the women who hopped on her defence might have been a gang of her friends. see, some women there have developed strong friendships over a course of time. Again, this explains the fact that some of them share pretty intimate insights with each other.
What I was talking about was women saying you're being disrespectful towards Eastern girls, referring to you as "harantis" and quoting your posts from THIS forum. At first I was wondering why? Why you? There are many people here, disappointed by meeting all these scammers and gold-diggers, saying things that are pretty harsh.
Anyway, I regret the fact that I was the one to grab your bait. You seem to be having a fun time provoking ladies on both forums. One simple question, why hate women so much?
P.S. Last time I took an IQ test was in my junior year in high school. My score back then was 135. You count the correlation Mr Great Mathematician.
Masha,
Hey, hey! ;-) I'm doing fine, thank you for asking. Yes, it's one of the most attractive profiles I've ever seen, including both photos and text, I mean. Now you are a serious competitor of the Angela Jolie's :-)))
Just one remark concerning your reply to harantis. Your explanation about ladies sharing "pretty intimate insights with each other" is plausible. However, a forum where posts can be read by anyone isn't the place to do that. That's for sure, especially if the names of the man who are "intimate" with these ladies are mentioned. If these ladies "have developed strong friendships", then for sure they have exchanged their private e-mail addresses with each other. Private e-mail is a legitimate way one can share intimate insights with her/his friends. A public forum is not, don't you agree?
P.S. I consider I.Q. a pretty idiotic thing. Essentially it measures one's ability to quickly solve relatively simple problems. However, it looks like harantis holds in high esteem only those whose I.Q. is high enough. I had my I.Q. measured some 20 years ago, that is when I was 23 y.o. I suppose some of my neurons have blown, in the meantime :-))) Anyway, my I.Q. was 155.
And how much of an IQ do all these guys have that send 100's or 1,000's of dollars to ladies, indeed men, that they have never met and never will meet?
Ladies might be dumb but so many men are dumber :)
I suggest the introduction of a new quotient. I still have to choose its name. It might be D.Q. (dumbness quotient) or maybe D.A.Q. (dumb-ass-ness quotient). A typical question in a test may sound like this:
A supermodel-looking Russian girl writes to you:
"hello my love... how r u today? I am so thankful to u that u want to help me! U r such a wonderful person with good heart and very special to me! I am so lucky that i have met u and i want to meet u in real life very much! My dean told me that i need to pay 460$ till the next friday or i will need to do this semester next year, i will lose whole year!"
What is your reaction?
1 - (S)he is a scammer.
2 - Mmmmhhh... is this normal? I don't trust her. What shall I do? What if I don't send her 460$? Maybe she won't love me anymore...
3 - I immediately trot to the nearest Western Union agency and send her 460$.
4 - I immediately trot to the nearest Western Union agency and send her 920$, so she can pay for the next semester in advance.