It's simple. Some people have been here for years giving advice on hour to find a FSU wife yet are unsuccessful. Why would you take their advice? I have been here about two years and am sitting next to a woman 20 years younger than me, way out of my league, happily married. You can take the advice of the paranoid unsuccessful searchers or take the advice from the groupgroup of people here who are happily married to women who honestly don't exist in the US. It is actually simple to find a FSU wife. It takes 2 years, $25,000 and you too can be among the happiest men on earth. I have begin writing a book about my successes and failures but Mt advice will always be free here.
You can take advice from those who have been trying for years and years and failed. It is only that they will not offer it to you but they will reveal what they have done in their bitter rantings and then you can use that to know what not to do.
congrats Tom. It is not as difficult as some think but you have to go to see for yourself. It does take time and money but in the end it is all worth it.
Somewhere along the line of courtship to marriage there lies a sweet spot called the element of luck. One can do the right thing and yet still run out of luck. When this person shares his experience, there is something to learn too. Quoting from a similar phrase by Edison, 'I am successful because I just found another way of how things might not work'.
Honestly the first time you go you should go for two weeks and have no expectations other than to see who FSU people are. If not that, go with a tour and ask a million questions. Then go over. I screwed up 4 times but being a scientist used scientific method to identify what went wrong and why. Then I nailed it. I got just the right method and just the right approach and met my wife that trip. All I can say I'd you will never find an American woman a perfect as an average us woman. I often work nights and I get home at 5:30 am. I have never gotten gone and out of the car before my wife met me outside. She sets her alarm to be up to get me! I will be glad to tell newbies step by step how to do this. It is easy but takes some common sense. Pm me and I will answer anything you wish but I don't like to post here because of all the bickering.
Tom, everyone is different. There is no one right method to "nail" a woman. Even after you "nailed" her, there are maintenance issues.
To answer your thread question, because good principles come from everyone. You can make your own judgment. If your principle of just going for the first time to ask a million questions comes from a failure, should you not follow it?
Two years ?
All for one Lady ?
Or does this include finding said Lady, developing a relationship, going to meet her, all the paper work, and finally having her over here?
Raging I didn't say I "nailed her". Can you read at all? I said I nailed it, as in method that works.
No Charlie, 2 years was from my first bumbling attempts to being married to the best woman I've ever known. Any faster and you marry a stranger. My first trip was a total waste other than to see what I was facing. I wasted time with scammers. But I went 4 times in 15 months for at least 2 weeks a shot. I met my wife April 2012, (it snowed every day!) And she was here last October after the 6 month process for a visa.
Spin it the way you want, Wifeseeker. You are still wrong. You have not addressed what we were talking about except by sarcasm. You have run out of argument so you start another.
There was no mistake. One of the things you will do when you nail it is to nail her. Everyone has their own personality. In the art of looking for a wife, it is better to do things your own way and fail than to do things someone else's way and succeed. Whose wife is it anyway?
Here is that link again, Wifeseeker. All I said was the divorce rate is much higher before the age of 26. You have been finding ways to refute it since. You have even accused me of many things but not address the issue properly. What is it with this statistics you don't understand?
http://goo.gl/FN91fT
And don't say it is just me trying to be smart. My intelligence is not the question here. What is it that I am not understanding?
I will tell you once and for all what you do not understand: that it is pointless discussing with you your favourite subject as you will never accept that you are only speculating. Why would I spend a minute more going to find information for you? Even if I found piles of reports by WHO, the UN, British and American government reports and statistics, etc, you would still argue that they are all wrong or you would understand what you want to understand from them to suit your argument.
I have a life and I am not wasting a smidgen of it on you.
Read my lips: There is no maturity age for getting married.
"Read my lips: There is no maturity age for getting married."
Wrong again. Again I dispute you. You are a dangerous man to be giving advice.
I am not speculating. The only such report you gave were the British on England and Wales 100 years data. Your criteria was supposedly met with one year data of the one hundred years and that was your proof. I gave the data on many years with Americans. I gave you various examples. You cannot and have not disputed that. You only attacked my character.
You gave no other such reports because there are none that proves your point. You don't know even know how to read data. Look at your study on drinking. When it was being discussed, your exact words was:
"The claim that 1/4 of Russian men die before the age of 55 is by the Lancet and BBC, not me. Read carefully. They know more than me."
In other words, you accept full pledge what they say without even looking at it. You are what accuse me of: manipulating data to make your point. Instead of looking for your own success, you choose to bring down others. The fact was, your own people drink almost as much as them. They were only speculating about what caused the low mortality rate.