Send Flowers to Russia, Ukraine and Worldwide with Cyber-Florist.com Fiance.com: Beautiful Russian brides
Home  |  About  |  Forum  |  User Blogs  |  Login  |  Register

	Create New Topic   My Posts   My forum buddies   Invite friends   Private messages Russian brides > Main Forum > anyone get replies from ladies to stop correspondence when a meeting is suggested? Author Post Adman Member send PM   block PM add to buddies Send: 2/20/2007 8:27:43 PM   If I am wrong Arthur, it will be the first time;)) I havent written to women on this site for a while but I am sure when I did, the number never increased with the amount of letters I sent them. I would also think the number of letters woman received would relate to men writing to them in the last 12 months. Admin should know jetmba. Member send PM   block PM add to buddies Send: 2/20/2007 9:03:45 PM   The number shown - is the number of letters she has received THROUGH FIANCE.COM. Its not the number of guy she has written to. And its not even the real number of letters - since women often give their email address and those letters of course wouldn't be included in the total. Its simple the number of letters she has received here. kingarthur Member send PM   block PM add to buddies Send: 2/21/2007 1:54:41 AM   It is exactly as jetmba states. Actually, I noticed that the "number of letters received" by the girl increases by 1 as soon as I send a letter to her. Adman, I am awfully sorry, but there is always a first time ;-)) boredfukka, yes, I know for sure that a few girls I've been corresponding with are genuine. I know this because I met them in person, and I found that they are good girls with serious intentions. Please, forgive me if I do not advertise their ID's. Thank you in advance for your understanding :-) kingarthur Member send PM   block PM add to buddies Send: 2/21/2007 2:01:02 AM   boredfukka, if you want to find a genuine girl - of course you want this - I wholeheartedly suggest to you to forget the girls that look too good to be true. Chances are that they are. harantis Member send PM   block PM add to buddies Send: 2/21/2007 2:48:33 PM   Adman, With due respect, I have to agree with KingArthur. Indeed, when a woman is sent an email through the site, the "number of letters received" is incremented by one, rather immediately. I have paid careful attention to this detail adn record the number on my copy of all correspondence I send to women as a means of guessing at how many other gentlemen she may corresponding simultaneously. kingarthur Member send PM   block PM add to buddies Send: 2/23/2007 4:04:49 AM   Harantis, ho do you estimate the number of gentlemen she may be corresponding with simultaneously? Stimulated by your post, I have been thinking about it. Take a long enough time U during which you have been corresponding with the woman. Divide this time by the number of letters N you have been sending to the woman over that time. Define A = U/N. A is the average time for a letter exchange between you and this woman to take place. Assuming that the time for a letter exchange to take place is largely dictated by how frequently the woman visits her agency, A can roughly represent the time required for the lady to have a letter exchange with any gentleman she is in correspondence with. Then, you should record the numbers of letters received by the woman at two dates sufficiently apart from each other - say two or three weeks, the more the better (call this time T) - and call B the difference between these numbers of letters received. Define T' = T/A. T' represents time B as measured in units of average letter exchange. Then the number of gentlemen G is given by G = B/T'. Be careful, U and T must be given in the same time unit, days for instance. kingarthur Member send PM   block PM add to buddies Send: 2/23/2007 4:09:28 AM   Sorry, it should read: "T' represents time T as measured in units of average letter exchange." If you find any mistakes, please tell me. jetmba. Member send PM   block PM add to buddies Send: 2/23/2007 7:37:13 AM   kingarthur: Your formulas are entirely misleading. Some women are entirely aware the the fact that each letters received through the site is tallied and number presented to all. These women will QUICKLY suggest that all correspondence be done by personal email. As an extreme example, suppose the number of letters she receives from OTHER MEN in a week is five, and she guides each of these to personal email, she could be having very close and significant correspondence with five new men every week, while her tally on fiance.com increase by exactly five during that period. On the other extreme, suppose a woman receives five letters from duds (guys she really isn't interested in) and doesn't ever write back (since maybe she is enjoying her correspondence with you). This woman's tally will increase by the exact same five during the week. In four weeks, each lady described above has a a tally increase of 20. Yet one lady has twenty guys on the hook through personal emails, (and needs a personal secretary to keep track of all of the deep correspondence with each of them). While the other lady has brushed all others off, as she wanted nothing to do with them and she is only corresponding with you. kingarthur Member send PM   block PM add to buddies Send: 2/23/2007 7:56:41 AM   jetmba, your objections are absolutely sound. Of course, the estimate given by my formulas can be reliable only if certain hypotheses are fulfilled. In particular, the woman should be in correspondence with ALL men only through the agency email. If YOU have been corresponding with her for a while only through the agency email, the hypotheses is likely to be fulfilled. Of course there can be a few letters that she received and just declined. This can lead to over-estimate the final result. The more the real situation approaches the two extremes depicted by you, the less the result is meaningful. Nonetheless, I think that my formulas can give a reasonable estimate in many cases. beemer18 Member send PM   block PM add to buddies Send: 3/24/2007 11:33:52 AM   Hey guys, Jet,King Was in Ukraine when this thread was going. I just barely read it. Low and surprise this girl Nadja is on several web sites. If you would like to see some great pics of her she is in anastatia and natashaclub. Guess she is JUST a dater and also probably scammer for her agency. But quite stunning. I will e-mail her with a gonna be in Riga in a month..lets meet. I hope she doen't agree!!!!!!! Then it is a bored's problem. Anyway to find out what admin found about this girl? Olga?? Ps- I got the long indepth story that bored got!!!She gets tons of letters in natasha also!! beemer18 Member send PM   block PM add to buddies Send: 3/24/2007 11:43:06 AM   Sheeee's back. Profile 69834 is back up for you sex peeps. Her pics on other sites are are much better. This site only has one. You are gonna have pay $$$$ to see the ones I have!!:)))) beemer18 Member send PM   block PM add to buddies Send: 3/24/2007 11:47:05 AM   Bored, I agree with Jetmba, you will never get in good terms with girls if you call them "Boris" in your letters. I am sure you know this , right! Just a thought!!!! A retract, maybe it is not a good idea to tell Nadja that I will be in Riga next month!! kingarthur Member send PM   block PM add to buddies Send: 3/24/2007 11:56:39 AM   Man age from: 27 Man age to: 58 This tells A LOT. beemer18 Member send PM   block PM add to buddies Send: 3/24/2007 11:59:31 AM   King, Have to say she did that because of me, sorry. Did you check out other pics?? kingarthur Member send PM   block PM add to buddies Send: 3/24/2007 12:08:56 PM   I can't find her in natashaclub. What's her ID or nickname? jetmba. Member send PM   block PM add to buddies Send: 3/24/2007 12:10:50 PM   Hey Beemer: We don't NEED #69834. WE have #78563. There's easily got to be twice the quantity there (in #78563) of...... something. (Brings to mind the saying that all fat women of America use everyday "There's just more of me to love." Shudder.) But seriously - she upped her acceptable age limit to 58 for you? Are you serious? Are you 58? If you happen to have some good photos of #69834 and don't know whar to do with them - or want a verifying opinion of them (at no charge mind you) - you might send them to me at jetmba@yahoo.com. I will be happy to give them my utmost attention. kingarthur Member send PM   block PM add to buddies Send: 3/24/2007 12:14:42 PM   Beemer, you know my e-mail address. If you want a second opinion... Beemer is MUCH younger than 58 :-) danny3777 Member send PM   block PM add to buddies Send: 3/24/2007 12:14:45 PM   $460 jetmba jetmba. Member send PM   block PM add to buddies Send: 3/24/2007 12:21:15 PM   $460 Martin? No. I'm offering my assessment to Beemer for FREE. I'm giving him a break from the customary $460 babe-verifying fee. Why? Because we're FRIENDS in this forum. And friends do things free for friends. kingarthur Member send PM   block PM add to buddies Send: 3/24/2007 12:28:29 PM   I have the best deal of all to offer. I'll go and check up for Beemer if she's real, honest, decent, whatever. That'll be $920. Beemer, I love you. Your Reply: Your name:   New Registration Password:   Forgot password?   refresh Code:   Russian brides > Main Forum > anyone get replies from ladies to stop correspondence when a meeting is suggested?
	Pages: 1 2 3 4 5