RB, if you are going to quote history, get your numbers right...
Battle of Dyrrachium....30,000 to 10,000
Battle of Pharsalus.....45,000 to 22,000
Cesars men were much more experienced.....along with Mark Anthony joining forces
Excerp......With his men, Caesar faced one of the most desperate battles of his career. From late August of 48 B.C. to February of 47, the Romans fought a complicated series of engagements (yes, 20,000 to 4,000) but proved victorious because of luck and the arrival of reinforcements from across the dying Republic. The Roman defenses extended only to the section of Alexandria that contained the royal palace.....in January news arrived that a large force of approximately 20,000 men had come from the north-eastern provinces, under the command of the mercenary, Mithridates of Pergamum. In February 47 B.C., the battle of the Nile was won by the Romans and the mercenaries...
I wrote a thesis on Julius Ceasar in college, just had to look up the numbers from my footnotes...RB it is called research, getting the whole story....
"You are the only one that has ever called me on it"
RB, do you ever comprehend what is written here in posts? Just go up a bit to Thunderdome, he had some thoughts that went through one part of your brain and out the other. When there is a problem it is usually YOU and somebody else......and the common phrase is YOU.
This is another one of your highlights.....
"The guy who brought the wine offered me a cigarette. I went to the smoking compartment without putting my shoes on. I inhaled, but did not allow the smoke to go through my nose. When I got back, the other guy asked me if I smoked. I told him I didn't. He got on my case not just for smoking but also walking without shoes. I did have socks on.
WTF are you saying??????????????? Think about this, you don't smoke, yet you accepted the cig, went to the smoking comparment, took a whif and didn't let it go through your nose.....and a complete stranger gets on your case......NOT for the smoke, NOT for socks, but for being an idiot.......
Beemer, my source for the Julius Caesar was the HBO video, "ROME". On the special features, they had historical facts. Their historian was Jonathan Stamp. The claims are he researched the data thoroughly, so the show will be close to historical facts, including uniforms. If you have any complaints with the facts, take it up with him. I have already watched the entire CD collection four times. I did not make any mistakes in restating what he did.
I am an idiot for not following your ways. I have not gotten sick in the past three years, not even a cold. It was 100 F in Southern California when I left and it was 25 F in Ukraine. I did just fine. Did it ever occur to you that others are living just fine without living as you do? How many times have you gotten sick in the past three years? Now, who is the idiot?
As for Thunderdome, he said he has not been here for a while and saw my posts. He does not know what happened. My advice to him is to keep out of it. Are you really pissed off just like Julian for my posts? That is what I did. You don't like it? Live with it. Don't read it. That is what I told Julian.
"Actually, it did strike me funny when i read Kirk's post about JC being shot dead. I was under the impression he was stabbed in the back with a knife/ves......hmmmm......maybe that is where the term 'backstabber' came from????"
By the way, as long as we are getting technical, is the term "backstabber" the same as in Latin? Also, are you aware that Julius Caesar was stabbed 23 times, not just in the back? The first knife came from the front and Caesar caught it. You need to do better in your research.
This is too stupid, Beemer that you too are pissed off in my posts. I can understand the rampage, but I wanted to get him off my back. That is what Thunderdome saw.
I suggest to you that you are not pissed off because of that. You are pissed off because I told you to stuff it when you told me to post somewhere else. I am the only one being told to post somewhere else when my posts are innocent. I just got tired of it.
I do arm exercise three times a week, three sets with a five minute rest in between. That's a little more than ten minutes, three times a week. I alternate four exercises, pull up both ways, push ups and push ups in the parallel bars. I bulked up. When my gf invited her friend in Kiev, she asked me to take my shirt off to show off my upper body.
You are not amused and you are about to die laughing that you need to call 911? One could say you need to be in Julian's special needs class. Notice I said, "One could". That is not my opinion. Still, I'm glad you did not say you are pissed off.
Sorry RB for not getting back to you because of family matters. And I do apologize for the members of this forum to have to read this shit but I just wanted to respond once and only once to someone I know has half a brain or uses only half.....
"Read and heed, Beemer.
I do arm exercise three times a week, three sets with a five minute rest in between. That's a little more than ten minutes, three times a week. I alternate four exercises, pull up both ways, push ups and push ups in the parallel bars. I bulked up. When my gf invited her friend in Kiev, she asked me to take my shirt off to show off my upper body.
WTF is that RB....ooooo...I just just shaking in my boots. Maybe you should be spending that time reading books and to bulk up what is between your ears. Well, to answer your ragingbull-ism with another ragingbull-ism. A girl I know pulled me aside at a party, she wanted to show her friend something...I was asked to take an article off, with amazement the oh and ahs, as one girl said," so big and muscular. Yes, guys, I proceeded to pull my pants back up!!!! WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why do you continue to use the word 'rampage'...no one used that word but YOU. The word we used was 'rampant', maybe similar in meaning but you need to see how it is used in the sentence...
"Rampant Bulls$%t, just means a lot of bullshit. Rampage is more reckless and violent behavior, now after reading my post, maybe just maybe you will get to that point...I will assume 2-3 posts now.
Army of Brides is a well known scam site. You should really do a better job of doing your homework.
Another RagingBullism, is AOB isn't a scam site and he's argued that with me before.
I just copied that out of a recent post. Maybe RB would like to refute that gentleman also.
Let's see if Hypocricy plays it's way in here or the race card.
Someone living in the US should know that there should be good evidence of scams before you accuse them of such. Your explanation of AOB being a scam is no more than their reputation and being a big company. I have not said AOB is not a scam, but you should give more evidence than that. They steal others profiles? What's to keep the others from doing the same. What are the rules on that. Are they allowed?
Oh gee RB maybe the evidence of the ladies of Mariupol wasn't good enough for you. Stealing pictures is enough. That tells an intelligent person who contacts that ladies profile she will know nothing about the communication, hence could be labeled a scammer because of the agencys actions, it has happened multiple times in Mariupol and I know this from personal experience not what I've read. Again, How many times have been to Mariupol?
Danny isn't time to fire up the Pitts and take it out on a beautiful day in Oz for a flight.
I hear when danny drops his pants in the FSU they girls giggle. Instead of worry about the rough toilet paper on your ass you should worry how that same paper chaps your lips since that's where all the shit comes out of danny.