"A_M : Caution this guy is surely a careless hoaxster.
You can find his wild accusations through the Usenet. Newsgroup forums in various porn newsgroup sites. If I were a gambling man I would say this person is using fabricated arguments..... 100% sure of it"
So AM, you're a gambling man AND 100% sure? Enjoy your wealth, you must be as rich as Bill.
Also you use "unless she is a professional model". Unless?? I thought you were 100% sure?
But that model-bit surely (I ask see, I'm not sure) refers to her beauty attracting you? And then you did not get the exclusive focussed attention from her which you thought you deserved so you accused her of being dishonest, implicated her being a pornstar and all other niceties?
Australian_Man, you've ever been accused of being a wanker? Again I'm not sure hence my question.
The proof is in the pudding, and now that you seem incapable of finding any pic's (even ask here for some forwarding) that pudding somehow appears a bit virtual, I'm 100% sure you don't mind me saying that here.
Whenever next you're intending not to hurt anyone, and in doing so trying to help everyone, sit back & ponder, and think what would be next. Ever thought of addressing her direct, or, in case of any scamming-accusations, produce some funds-requests to the moderators, in private that is?
You see, and this might be news to you, this is actually their job, they in fact get paid for that here - they check, and follow up using channels unavailable to you however far more effective.
Regarding the latter you seem to have scored in any case - she's gone now, without having asked you for a cent, maybe aided by some jerk who used her pic in a chatsite or fake profile, but by the looks of things definitely aided by your initial post proving final here.
Whenever next you start drooling over someone's pic and can't stand the fact that maybe others are writing to her, maybe even copy & paste her pic on site's you 'stumble' across (those pornsite's), you actually, because you don't want to hurt anyone as you said, might want to take some action.
Ever considered the fact that utterly ignoring catagorizes as such?
Thunderdome, Yes I am a Gambling man, Especially when I can bet on a sure thing.
Why dont you put your money were your mounth is.
Send me the pictures of the lady, ( Paul_R_Smith@engineer.com )
and If i can prove that there are many many pictures of her (erotic nature)on the intrenet, You delete your profile here and Piss off for ever. If I can not I will write a public appology, plus an apologgy to the women (which someone can email her)and delete my profile here for ever, never to return Hows that sound?
Dont come back with a smart arse comment or post. Just send the pictures to me, I will find others of her, and your out of here dipshit.
I will send these photos to anyones email who asks me to, and you all can make up your own mind.
I have better things to do than falsely accuse women of using fake photos.
ok, No need to e-mail me the photo of her. I have found all the porn style photos she used and said was her.
This site (finace.com) still shows the girls picture (#35173) under the advertising for on the home page, despite her profile being deleted. She deleted her profile after I accused her of being a fake...... I wonder why? Because she is a fake, using photos found on the internet porn sites.
After a one minute search I found many many erotic photos of her in the usenet newsgroups And I even found the website.
Do you mean the cover girl on this site, Jodie. I give you this, it looks a bit like her but I would not put money on it, its not that close. Come on Aussie, thats your proof. I think one photo is similar but that happens all the time. This whole thing is just getting out of hand. I do not know either way but still, it's not 100%
Maybe, I just compared the cover photo with the others, same shape face and even the same hair and eyebrows. To close to call but there is something in it, I'll give you points for an eagle eye. How bored are you anyway to track such shit down. This one will have to go to a vote I think LOL
victory is yours Australian man. My humble opologies but you should had given this earlier. I can admite that this is her and she is showing her little girly thing for all to see. Lessons all round here. If anyone wants the photos just ask I will be glad to help
but also because of this:
"Send me the pictures of the lady, ( Paul_R_Smith@engineer.com )"
What pics? I should provide your proof, have them even, and you don't?
Never seen this girl, not even now (at work), and to be quite honest why should I?
So, seeing that ID has seen her twat now also makes her a scammer. Interesting, because plenty of nude models in artclasses pose for free, and she - presumably - did it for money because it's on the net. That does not make her a scammer really, unless (you see, I'm unsure) she told you that she never posed nude, was not a photomodel or has catagorically denied to you that this is her - which still seems possible, not so?
Fact is, she did not (did she?) ask you for money or denied that these photo's are hers - because you did not ask (did you?).
That is why you should have addressed her or the moderators, especially so when she asked you for even token-contributions like Icafe-cost.
But she did not - you found pics which look like her, naked. The fact that even models may want to marry goes past you, you made your posting.
Olga contacted her and she feels insulted - that's a bit of a strange reaction for some pornstar smeared all over the net, knowingly, and getting paid for that.
Being a self-admitted gambling man, a safe bet is always contacting the Moderators, don't you think? But a guy with balls would have confronted herself with it, get it out, tell me, now!
Costs only 1 mail, same like the post you made, however the outcome would have been different - and less destructive IF you are wrong.
Which still is possible - still not 100% sure because no-one ever is, and you weren't there.
No criticism from this end. Personally I think you were treated very badly by some of these people here. It was totally unnecessary and rude. I would like to see more middle ground stuff from people like you and a lot less of this stupid macho agressive crap. It is easy to say anything you want on a faceless forum with the mask of anonymity. There is no need for any of this stuff. We are all involved in the same thing, to try and share information bounce ideas off one another so as to find someone to spend the rest of our lives with. Attacking fellow forum members with this gung ho, John Wayne crap achieves nothing except create bad feeling. There is enough of that to go around already without us adding to it. I would like to see a lot more information and a lot less personal agression here. If you folks have something to say do it in a respectful friendly way. It is completely possible to disagree without trying to be a smart ass of verbally beat up on someone. I'm done.
Not a problem I must say that she was not my intended target but seemed to be sinsere enough. I must say I agree with Aus Man she ran when confronted and as soon as she thought the investigation was over she blanked out of sight! Now just a full email address and no responses....hmmmm. I do think we all learned allot and thank Izi it is refreshing to have people like you as well. I think the people here that should be questioned are the agency that continued her lie. IF she is who she told me she was she would not be posing nude anywhere as she said her family was quite rich and the scandle would hurt them. Who ever the picture is of she deffinatley has no problem with it. I do not believe the pictures where of the person I corresponded with but aus man was correct she stole them to sell contacts for her agency! But again this is speculation I have ask Oleg to enlighten me about the agency we will see.