eeyore, to my figuring, basic membership lets you put your profile up. Maybe a girl will write to you. You cannot read it but you start wondering who it is. If you want to read it you pay, but for free you have ssen if your profilr has generated any interest. Please can we all start some lateral logical thinking here? please.
Not, sharp or quick of wit-- is one of the definitions of obtuse, in Websters---How can that be? You are, quick of wit and some might even say, sharp, in your own speecial way.
So why do you want to play games with reasonably nice people, who are only trying to help you? There's got to be better things to do on the Internet!
well, eeyore, your profile is advertised to thousands of ladies fro free. they start writing to you. it means there is an interested to your person. so, now to use the system you have to pay membership fee to get access to all features of the system. for free communication use ICQ for example.
eeyore,
anyone who today worries about his shady past is unworthy of the best this site has to offer....please follow Lodziak68's steps and kindly get the f...k out of this forum.
The rules of this site are simple.
If you are intelligent enough to find this site, you also have the wits to understand it.
This is the best balanced site available to those of us who seek information and access to attractive, honest and educated FSU women interested in western men.
Part of that balance means that the site operator is entitled to make a profit.
If that part of the balance causes you to sleep crooked, we simple do not give a f..k about it.
Does that register with you?
Go find somewhere else to whine about it.
Toad- I know alot of people that probably admire you! They all live in a hospital here named "Longview". They would like to write you but it's hard to type when your arms are constricted in a white jacket with the sleeves crossed in front of them and tied behind their back. They get so mad at that sometimes that they beat their heads on the wall, but don't worry because their rooms have thick padding on them.
Crazy donkey...How can you expect the woman who you want to marry to speak English if you yourself have a problem understanding the language? Where is the logic? Oh I forgot, you are just delusional.
My distinguished donkey, I answered to your other post already, so you know I am not after you. I must say though, I do not believe in psychoanalysis, I am a cognitive behavioral therapist, so I do not believe in the interpretation of dreams. However, having read Freud’s book “the Interpretation of Dreams” I would think he would have said that your “vision of wild dogs attacking a donkey” would be related to your inner desire of wanting to or having been gang raped. And I am not kidding, Freud was way out there. A modern psychoanalyst however, would probably tell you that your vision is probably related to your feelings of inferiority caused most likely by your mother and perhaps your peers when you were a young child; along with having experienced an authoritarian father who constantly put you down.
As far as “I don’t thin I am delusional” I could easily argue my point...no delusional individual would ever notice that he or she is delusional; that is part of the disorder.
As I see it, I am only guilty of asking a question about the semantics of the words 'receive' and 'read', plus some 'musing' about the practicalities seen from my own very personal situation.
I certainly got a response!!
Dax,
Sorry, the 'you' who were 'after me' (as you write it) should be the plural 'you'.
(Youse ? You mob?...)
My spelling of Sigmund's last name expresses an opinion.
And, I made up the vision - but you could probably come up with a number of interesting interpretations yourself. -Else try to read some fiction (apart from 'Sigmund').
And you have just told me something about 'modern psychoanalysts'.
How could the picture of a single herbivore attacked by a pack of carnivores possibly be interpreted the way you describe?
But, before we get lost in concerns about the human mind struggling to understand itself, and the relationship between language and thought, I think we must conclude that we are a bit off topic.
How did I get myself into this fine mess in the first place?