You come up with nothing original! Same old claptrap that you fascists drag out, if someone disagrees they are socialist or communist.
I dont recall mentioning here the solution to the worlds problems is government running industry. A good start would be the US obeying international law, the secretary of state (that wuss Powell) blatantly lying to the UN security council. Start with punishing politicians that take military action that is unprovoked and unlawful.
Iraq has no bearing on American culture! The terrorists that attacked the WTC were mainly Saudis. Saudis are the main funding source for al qaeda. Saudi arabia is not a democracy. When are you going to invade and deal with this insidious regime, spread some of your democratic fervour!
You know Nas it would be a challenge if you could provide some sort of rational argument for the invasion of Iraq apart from regurgitating the lies that Bush has consistently used to justify his actions. Lets face it his main rationale was he was embarassed that his daddy was deemed a failure for not getting rid of Saddam and he is going to show the world what should have been done! What a loser!
However feel free to to continue being an apologist, I will let the forum get back to discussing women.
I was all for the Iraq invasion, firstly to get the WMD's that have become invicible!! and also to get rid of a nasty dictator, I think we in the west thought that the Iraqi's would be glad to be freed and would grasp democracy, instead they resort to type, all the pc brigade and lefties blame the u.S. and British for the mess in Iraq, i don't, i blame the Iraqi's, they had there chance for peace, but decided to kill one another instead, sod em.
As for Saudi Arabia, it would be a doddle to invade and control, as all there Fighter jets are maintained by westerners, just attack at Ramadam, leave the very wealthy royal family to live in London, where spend most of the time, steal their oil, and when it's fini9shed give the dump back :-)))
I was surprised to see 108 replies on my topic, and yet almost none to do with me.
It turns out that all my suspicions about Natalia were wrong. She's actually a very good girl. No sex still even though we live in the same rental apartment. She says she's a virgin so I must marry her to get some.
I'm using her as a salesgirl for my products. There's no way that you see her smile and dare say 'no' to her.
I've tested her different ways to judge her loyalty and she passed them all of them.
International Law Gemini? What exactly is that? The ICC at the Hague? The same body that took 5 years to prosecute Slobadon Milosevich for war crimes and didn't get it done even though he was representing himself? What sovereign body does the ICC represent? The UN Charter? Or the same body that has influenced George Bush to side with a brutal murderer for a double homicide in Texas of two young girls in Texas? A murder that was so hideous most media channels aren't even talking about it except for the reason Bush doesn't want him to be executed because he didn't know he could get legal representation from the consulate in Mexico? The same body who supports illegal immigration into the United States. Which this guy was an illegal immigrant. Or is this the same body that tried to stop the beheading of Nick Berg? What most people don't understand that illegal immigration is just a ploy to take away more freedoms from Americans, and in no ways supports the poor that come here to the states legally. It is totally intended to destroy our borders and culture. I never heard on a phone in Ukraine, press 2 for English when I phoned my wife from Borispol. A reason to document not only immigrants but Americans in the future with the excuse they need to know where the illegal immigrants are so they can be taxed. No it will be used against Americans who won't bow down to the alter of the UN. It won't do a damn thing to stop the violation of a sovereign nations laws.
The only reason you support international law is because it would usurp the constitution of the United States. It's an anti American, Anti semitic group that wants to see the destruction of a democracy in Isreal and a Constitutional republic in the United States. To support International law, which never accomplished anything is to support a one world government, which makes you a socialist. How many people were prosecuted for crimes against humanity in Rwanda?None!Real great job by the ICC. The same tribunal that didn't look at Bill Clinton as a war criminal, but will mouth the words that George Bush is. The same Bill Clinton who, changed the US markings on aircraft to Nato markings to bomb innocent Serbs, the targets were homes and hotels not military targets. It was okay for Billy Socialist to do these things against a people, but not one word uttered was uttered against Clintons actions, but George Bush is a war criminal.Why were in in Kosovo? The excuse was the Evil Milosevich was comitting Genocide, but Hussien wasn't? The same tribunal that would not utter a word in the defense of Michael New that refused to wear a UN emblem on his uniform, which is against United States Military regulations, who was summarily court martialed and given a dishonorable discharge, where were they then to support his rights and freedoms? Though they will pipe up about the death penalty in the US of an illegal alien who snuffed out two young lives, a man who raped, sodomized a 14 year old girl. Who himself quipped this bitch won't die as he an a another murderer pulled a belt so tight choking her that it broke.
This is the same body who did nothing as Hussien defied 14 UN resolutions and committed mass homicide agains the Kurds. No wmd's? ask the Kurds, no nuclear program, ask Isreal when they hit his nuclear reactor in 1981. The same body that pitched a bitch that the people of Iraq prosecuted this maniacal dictator. The same body that stands by as thousands are killed in Darfur, but will say the United States is guilty of torture of terrorists. The same body that wants to dissolve every countrys sovereignty which is a God given right, to put them under a dictatorial rule of the UN.
I support a Nations right to rule themselves as their constituents deem necessary. I believe in individual rights, and the prosecution of criminals that violates these rights. I believe all races and individuals deserve these rights given to them by God. I believe in limited government that denies autocracy and control over a free market. I don't believe in a strong centralized government that takes social and economic freedoms away from the individual. I believe in the right of people to speak in opposition of my government even though I don't agree with them. Though socialists like yourself support people like Soro's who want to supress the right to oppose the evils of socialism and communism.
So you call me a fascist because you use the epithet to denigrate me and my speech. To compare me to a Hitler or Mussolini because of the evils they represented. It's a great coloring, but in reality I am so far from being a fascist it's laughable. It conveys to me you don't even understand the definition of fascism, but since it's related to the evils of a past time it works for the sensation of the word.
Though you do fit the definition of a socialist, one who would give up his God given rights to a one world body. You believe in denying Sovereign nations the right to protect and defend themselves. You support the supression of freedom of speech. Though I don't think you understand that right too much. If you don't like the label of a socialist then don't act like one. We have a sacred document called the constitution, which is the single greatest document of freedom ever written by men whose vision went beyond the ages. It has been under attack by your ilk that supports international law and removing the sovereignty of each nation. You act repulsed when God is invoked in governmental matters. When in reality it was God that created the nation state. You stand up and point fingers at men, who supposedly of great moral character fail, but will not chastise your own when they fail. That's called hypocricy. If you like I will send you my wifes Websters dictionary, she understands the words fascism, hypocricy and freedom way better than you comprehend the subject.
I've tested her different ways to judge her loyalty and she passed them all of them.
Koop....did you try the one about cutting off her $$$$$...bet you don't want answer to that because she will be gone for sure.....so much for judging, you know answer already. I can imagine your tests........Do you really love me?......Will you ever leave me?......Do want to get married?...Am I the only one for you?...................Huh!!!
To understand Natalia you must understand 2 distinct cultures of the world. New and old.
New culture is the girlfriend-boyfriend culture as in the US western Europe Romania Bulgaria - no virgins - both partners of same age or close in age - both partners bring home the bacon - realtıonshıps based almost exclusively on looks of both partners - both partners enjoy sex but still relationships don't last.
Old culture is as is or was in Moldova - virgins - 10 to 20 year difference in ages - financial security more important than looks - women are harder to turn on than a 1906 Ford. This is Natalia.
Koop, i'm sorry but it sounds like you're trying to convince yourself that your girl is into you, ok let's say she wont let you go all the way, see how far she will let you go, once a girl is aroused, they usually can't stop....if she doesn't let you do more than kiss, i would think why!
You also could marry her,and see if she keeps her word!
Nas, America is kept the number one super power, by A communist faction, it is called the U.S. Army, think about it, thousands of men all fighting for the same cause, wearing the same uniform, eating the same food, with same basic training.
No form of government is perfect but in some cases socialism works very well, look at the Armish, or the kibbutz movement in Israel, and in the fsu, many people would like it back.
Different people like different things.
Gemini, I guess when you bring up facts that you can't refute is a bizarre rant. You and Wtrav02 have to be the same guy.
Zeeco, The army isn't communist by any means. Especially when many people are trained in different occupations. Take the Navy for example, one of the elite fighting forces in the World are the Seals and by far not related to the day to day occupation of the typical sailor.
As for socialism, it doesn't work and it never has. The Amish aren't socialist by any means. Though they help each other in many ways, they still require self reliance to support their families. In college I did a term paper in Macro-economics on the effect of the Reagan tax cuts. Federal revenue quadrupled but an out of control congress outspent the income, but thats not the thing that I found interesting. Being an optimist I believe the majority of people are good and decent. This was proved in research of this paper that charitable contributions tripled during this time. That being said, most people will give a hand up to help the government has given handouts and enslaved a class of people who have lived on this for generations. Socialist taxation is nothing more than legalizing theft. I can never endorse taking one mans property who earned it and giving it to another that didn't. In the states there are more charitble organisations to help the people in need, without the fat and waste of government control. Nothing good can come out of socialism. It only will create a greater class envy because it stifles the human nature to want to succeed.
Saddam agreed to weapon inspections as a condition of suurender.
One thing though, it wasn't 14 UN resolutions Saddam defied, it was 17--all while delaying weapon inspectors at the front gate as the WMD's went out the back.
We know he had WMD's because he used them! You pointed out the Kurds but you forgot the southern Iraqis and the Iranians he gassed during their war.
One more thing, everyone beleived he still had WMDs--the Russians,Israelis, Clintons, UN, CIA--the mystery remains where they went and why didn't Saddam say they were gone (either used up or hidden). My guess? He wanted to appear powerful and didn't guess the the sooner or later day would come and someone would come calling.
If anyone cares, I'm conservative but no party partisian--I won't let politics get get in the way of the facts.
well we have a Batman here on this forum and am i pretty certain there was a Robin that posted here on this forum at one other time, all we need now is for Spiderman, incredible hulk, and the green goblin to make an appearance here.
maybe they are on vacation in ukraine.
Guys, I'm starting my own line of female apparel. Will announce the brand name soon. Natali will be my model. I always wanted to see my name written on the back of chick's rears.
Koop,
"She says she's a virgin so I must marry her to get some"
And when honeymooning you find out she lied then what?
You remind me of the stereotypical second-hand car salesman wearing the T-shirt saying 'A Sucker Is Born Everyday'. Talking of which, I'd personally never buy a car I'm not allowed to drive first. You reckon you can trade her in, as 'hardly used'? Oh wait, no, 'demo-model only, comes with a load of apparel'.
You see DrCardin, lines of anything in that genre are not born, they're bought - for astonishing loads of dough I truly am convinced of you have not even an idea about. But I wish you luck nonetheless.......
DrKoop,
I recon' the name 'DrKoop' has a nice ring to it. This would look good in red on the tight ass of a pair of chicks jeans. Girls know they can trust the doc, and the oriental undertones are cool.
If I felt that way about a woman, then I would certainly want to marry her.
Sounds to me like you may have found someone special, but if you can't turn her on, well, does she love you?
I would give it time and see how her feelings for you develop. Very best wishes.
Man, do I hate politics.